Yandex Metrika Image
CasinoLuck logo — opens the casino in a new tab

CasinoLuck Sister Sites

Every list you will find elsewhere was copied from another list. Here is the licence number, the register, and a checker that gives you the real answer in under a minute.

Run the licence check
Account: UKGC 39483
Licensee: Aspire Global International LTD
Brand list here: deliberately none

In forty words: a genuine CasinoLuck sister site is any other brand trading on UKGC account 39483, held by Aspire Global International LTD. Same licensee, same obligations, same complaints route. Shared software is not a sister. The register below gives you today’s list.

The phrase has been stretched until it means nothing. It gets used for brands with a common owner, brands renting the same game platform, brands sharing a payments provider, and — often enough — brands that share only an affiliate manager and a colour scheme.

That looseness would be harmless if the answer did not change what you are entitled to. Whether an operator-imposed restriction follows you, whether the terms binding your bonus are the same document, whether a stalled complaint lands with the same adjudicator: all three hang on the licence number and nothing else.

So this page does two things. It draws the line between the three categories people confuse, and it hands you the check that settles any specific brand in about a minute. What it does not do is print a list of names, and the section on the checker explains exactly why.

Who is actually behind the brand

The company answerable to the Gambling Commission for CasinoLuck in Great Britain is Aspire Global International LTD, which also appears in filings as AG Communications Limited, under account 39483. That entry covers remote casino, remote bingo and standard real-event betting.

Aspire Global occupies two roles at once in this market, and conflating them is the source of most bad sister-site lists. It is a licensed operator running its own brands, and it is a platform supplier whose software runs behind brands owned by entirely separate companies on entirely separate licences. A site can therefore look like CasinoLuck down to the cashier animation and have no legal relationship to it whatsoever.

Ownership above the licensee — parent groups, holding companies, who bought whom in which year — is interesting background and changes nothing about your rights. The account number is the line that matters.

Licensee

Aspire Global International LTD

UKGC account

39483

Activities licensed

Casino, bingo, real-event betting

A real sister site: same licence, same rules

If another brand appears as a trading name on account 39483, the relationship is legal rather than cosmetic, and five specific things carry across:

  • ✓ The same company is accountable for your balance and your complaint.
  • ✓ The same UK licence conditions apply — segregated funds, KYC before payout, GAMSTOP enrolment.
  • ✓ The same approved dispute body hears the case if it goes past eight weeks.
  • ✓ Restrictions the operator has placed on you generally travel with you.
  • ✓ Bonus wording tends to be near-identical, because one compliance team drafted both.
One thing that does not carry across: a fresh welcome bonus. Duplicate-account matching runs across brands on a shared licence, so a second welcome offer claimed on the same identity is usually voided rather than paid out.

Same platform, different operator — not a sister

This is the category that fills most sister-site articles, because it is the one you can spot by eye. The lobby grid is laid out the same way, the cashier asks for the same fields in the same order, the search behaves identically, and the game suppliers overlap heavily. Everything you recognise is the platform.

None of it is the licence. A brand renting the same software sits under its own licensee, publishes its own terms, sets its own wagering multiple and cash-out cap, and routes complaints to whichever ADR body its own licence names. Recognising the interface tells you who built the software and nothing at all about who is holding your money.

There is a legitimate use for the category: if you have simply run out of new games and want somewhere that feels familiar, a platform sibling is a reasonable place to look. Just do not assume anything about the terms because the buttons are in the same place.

Third category, for completeness

Brands marketed together, or sharing a parent somewhere further up the ownership chain without sharing the GB licence. It is real corporate information and it has zero effect on your rights as a player. If somebody offers it to you as a sister-site list, they are answering a different question from the one you asked.

Licence checker: get today’s answer

The Gambling Commission publishes every licensee together with every trading name operating under it. That record is the sister-site list, maintained by the regulator, current as of the moment you load it. Two ways to reach it:

Every UK-licensed casino prints it in the site footer — usually five digits, sometimes labelled “account number”.

This opens gamblingcommission.gov.uk in a new tab. For reference, CasinoLuck sits on account 39483.

If you only have the brand name

Search it on the public register. Four steps, about a minute:

  1. Type the brand name into the register’s search box.
  2. Open the business record that comes back and read off its account number.
  3. Hold it against 39483. Identical means a genuine sister; anything else means a separate operator, whatever the marketing implies.
  4. Scroll that record’s trading names — every brand on the list shares the licence, and that is the whole sister-site set.

A brand that returns no result is not licensed for Great Britain. That is not a technicality: it means no segregated player funds, no ADR route and no realistic way to recover a refused withdrawal.

Why we publish no brand list: portfolios move. Brands get sold, retired, re-licensed under a different entity, sometimes with no announcement at all. A list written today and left alone is wrong within a couple of quarters, and a wrong sister-site list does specific damage — it sends someone to a site with a different licensee, different terms and a different complaints route while they believe the opposite. The register is maintained by the regulator and updated when things change. A page like this one is not. Teaching the check is the only version of this article that stays true.

Four reasons people go looking — two of them work

Works: something specific is missing. A payment rail you use, a studio you like, a live variant that is not on the floor here. Moving brand genuinely fixes that, and this is where the platform-sibling category earns its keep — a familiar interface with a different game mix.

Works: the terms no longer suit you. If you have started depositing in the hundreds, the £100 ceiling on bonus winnings makes the offer here close to irrelevant, and a brand with an uncapped structure may be a better fit even at higher wagering. That is a real comparison, and the table below is how to run it.

Does not work: hunting a second welcome bonus. Sites on one licence check for duplicate identities between them. The usual ending is a voided bonus and a held balance.

Does not work: escaping a restriction or a stalled payout. An operator-imposed limit usually follows you across the group, and a self-exclusion through GAMSTOP blocks every UKGC-licensed site for the full term. As for a disputed withdrawal — changing brand does not resolve it and closing the account first makes the evidence harder to get back. Put the complaint in writing, wait out the eight weeks, then take it to IBAS.

Six lines that decide it — fill the third column yourself

Print this, open the candidate brand’s terms, and complete the right-hand column from its own pages rather than from a review. The headline bonus percentage is not on the list, because it almost never changes the answer.

Six criteria for comparing CasinoLuck against a candidate alternative brand
Line to check CasinoLuck The other brand
UKGC account number39483 — Aspire Global International LTDMatch = real sister. Everything below follows from this line
Wagering on the welcome offerCapped at 10×Compare to 35–40×, the UK norm
Ceiling on bonus winnings£100Usually buried deep in the T&Cs — find it before depositing
Deposit floor / withdrawal floor£10 / £10A higher withdrawal floor strands small balances
Payout window2–6 working days by railCompare wallet to wallet, not wallet to card
Named ADR bodyNamed in the terms; IBAS handles most GB disputesWhere a complaint lands after eight weeks

CasinoLuck column re-read against the operator’s published terms and the UKGC register entry on 6 November 2026.

Then vs now: what changed on this brand

Old comparisons of CasinoLuck against its alternatives are still circulating with figures that no longer hold. If you are working from something written before 2026, these are the lines to correct.

CasinoLuck terms before and after the January 2026 changes
Line Older write-ups say What holds now
WageringA conventional 35×-style requirementCapped at 10× since January 2026
Credit cardsListed as an accepted methodUnlawful for GB gambling since 14 April 2020
Second licenceOccasionally an MGA number quoted alongsideGB play runs on UKGC 39483 alone
Sister-site listsFixed lists of brand names, copied between sitesRead the trading names off the register instead

When the honest answer is: close this page

If you self-excluded and you are here looking for somewhere the block has not reached, this page cannot help you and should not. GAMSTOP covers every operator licensed in Great Britain for the term you chose. The sites that would still take a deposit from you sit outside UK regulation entirely: no segregated player funds, no approved dispute body, no realistic recourse when a withdrawal is declined. The pattern is well documented and it ends the same way most times.

The National Gambling Helpline is free, confidential and open around the clock on 0808 8020 133. GamCare and BeGambleAware will talk it through without lecturing you.

And if you are here to claim a second welcome bonus on the same licence: the duplicate-account checks find it, and the ending is a voided bonus with a frozen balance rather than free money.

Sister sites: the questions that actually get asked

So what are the CasinoLuck sister sites, named?

Whatever trading names sit on UKGC account 39483 today, held by Aspire Global International LTD. We deliberately do not reprint them, because that list moves and a stale one sends people to the wrong operator. The register entry above gives you the current set in about a minute, and it is authoritative in a way no affiliate page can be.

Who is the licensee behind CasinoLuck?

Aspire Global International LTD, which also files as AG Communications Limited, under Gambling Commission account 39483 for remote casino, remote bingo and standard real-event betting.

Two casinos look identical. Are they related?

Looking identical usually means they rent the same platform, which is not a relationship that affects you. Pull both account numbers off the public register: same number means one licensee and a genuine sister, different numbers mean two separate companies holding two separate sets of your rights.

Will my CasinoLuck restriction apply at a sister site?

If the operator imposed it, expect it to follow you across brands on account 39483 — that is how group-level restrictions are designed to work. A GAMSTOP self-exclusion is broader still and blocks every UKGC-licensed operator for the whole period.

Can I take a second welcome bonus at a brand on the same licence?

Almost certainly not. Duplicate-account checks run across brands sharing a licence, and a repeat welcome claim on the same identity is normally voided. The balance built on it can be held while that is investigated.

Do sister sites use the same bonus terms?

They often start from the same template, which makes the wording familiar and the assumption dangerous. Two lines vary far more than the headline: the wagering multiple and the cap on bonus winnings. Read those specifically rather than skimming for the percentage.

What if a brand does not appear on the register at all?

Then it is not licensed to offer gambling in Great Britain, and everything the UK regime gives you is absent — fund segregation, verified fairness, an approved complaints route. It is not a technicality about paperwork; it is the difference between a dispute you can escalate and one you cannot.

Researched, written and re-checked by

The CasinoLuck Terms Desk

UK bonus-terms and banking analysts

We read casino terms and conditions for a living, for a UK audience only. Nothing goes on this domain as a number until we can point at where it came from: the operator's own published terms, the Gambling Commission public register, or a regulator notice. Anything we cannot evidence is written as unknown rather than filled in, and the whole set is re-read on the cycle described on our About page.

Published Last updated Facts last checked

Published independently of CasinoLuck and of Aspire Global International LTD, who have no say in what appears here. Links on this page can earn the site a referral fee; the terms we publish are the ones in the operator’s own T&Cs either way. If a figure here has gone stale, send us the page and the correction — that is how most of the fixes on this domain start.

By The CasinoLuck Terms Desk, UK bonus-terms and banking analysts Published Updated Checked